Key Takeaways
- Hayes: Bitcoin does not need regulation to survive; if it did, it would be worthless.
- CLARITY Act: Hayes hopes Trump vetoes it if it reaches his desk.
- Banks should offer Bitcoin products to clients, but institutionalizing Bitcoin is different.
- Regulated Bitcoin products introduce counterparty risk Bitcoin was built to eliminate.
Hayes draws a distinction that most regulatory commentary collapses: banks should be allowed to offer Bitcoin products because their clients want them, but designing regulatory infrastructure to make Bitcoin institutionally acceptable is a different project, and one that produces a product with counterparty risk Bitcoin was specifically built to remove.
Banks want to offer crypto because clients want non-correlated assets that have performed well in inflationary environments and periods of fiat expansion. That is a legitimate business case and Hayes does not dispute it. What he di...


English (US)